
One reviewer liked the shine and the non-tacky feel, saying the formula delivered a glossy finish without feeling sticky. They also described the scent as matching the flavor, and noted that only a small amount was needed. That makes the product sound appealing for someone who wants visible gloss from a light touch, but the actual flavor was not named in that positive feedback.
Feedback on the watermelon version was less positive. In that review, it came across more like a gel than an oil, with only a faint watermelon scent, no visible color on the lips, and shine that faded quickly. The same reviewer also felt it did not condition the lips, so the experience sounded more cosmetic than nourishing.
The two experiences should be kept separate because the positive comment did not identify a flavor, while the watermelon version was described in detail and negatively. That means shoppers should not assume the same result across every flavor or expect the watermelon version to behave like the unnamed one. The comments do, however, suggest that finish, scent and feel can vary enough to matter at purchase.
As a buying choice, this looks more promising if you mainly want shine with a non-sticky feel and do not mind using only a little product at a time. If you are choosing the watermelon version, the reported faint scent, lack of visible color and quick-fading gloss are worth weighing carefully. The tube/applicator design was liked, but that alone does not answer how the formula will perform for you.
Check the retailer for current price and availability.